BRADLEY SMOKER | "Taste the Great Outdoors"

Recipe Discussions => Poultry => Topic started by: car54 on February 02, 2009, 04:46:38 AM

Title: Chicken 4 ways
Post by: car54 on February 02, 2009, 04:46:38 AM
Sunday I cooked the following recipe 4 different ways
http://www.dizzypigbbq.com/recipesWings.html (http://www.dizzypigbbq.com/recipesWings.html)

I used all the chicken parts not just the wings and all recieved 20 minutes of apple smoke.

Finished off in the Bradley Smoker
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/car54/th_PICT0008-1.jpg) (http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v314/car54/?action=view&current=PICT0008-1.jpg)

In the Big easy

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/car54/th_PICT0009-1.jpg) (http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v314/car54/?action=view&current=PICT0009-1.jpg)

In my Primo griil with BBQ Guru temperature control
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/car54/th_PICT0007.jpg) (http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v314/car54/?action=view&current=PICT0007.jpg)

In the stove
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/car54/th_PICT0010.jpg) (http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v314/car54/?action=view&current=PICT0010.jpg)

All pictures can be enlarged

Conclusions.

I did not put bbq sauce on any so that I could fairly judge the taste.
All were very crispy and moist.
The Bradley, Primo griil and the Bid Easy all looked good as far as color. The stove ones were lighter in color. The Primo looked the best because of the grill marks.
The Bradley one had more of a smoke flavor because they were good in an aged Bradley.
The Big Easy cooked in less then 1/2 a hour.
The primo ones tasted slighty ashy due to the very low temperature that was maintained by the BBQ Guru.

The best were between the Bradley and the Big Easy

Brad
Title: Re: Chicken 4 ways
Post by: Gizmo on February 02, 2009, 07:59:20 PM
The Bradley Pic and Stove Pic sure look similar.  :D
Must have modded a stove with the Bradley Generator right?  ;)
Title: Re: Chicken 4 ways
Post by: car54 on February 03, 2009, 03:12:46 AM
You are right Gizmo.
It has been corrected.

Thanks, Brad