BRADLEY SMOKER | "Taste the Great Outdoors"

Consumables and Accessories => Bradley Flavour Bisquettes => Topic started by: D.D. on January 24, 2013, 06:03:09 PM

Title: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: D.D. on January 24, 2013, 06:03:09 PM
Has anyone tried these? Good, Bad, Indifferent?? ::)
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: beefmann on January 24, 2013, 06:18:22 PM
have tried them ,,,like them a lot better then the standard oak
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: OU812 on January 24, 2013, 06:53:17 PM
Quote from: beefmann on January 24, 2013, 06:18:22 PM
have tried them ,,,like them a lot better then the standard oak

What he said,,,,,,,,,,,,,cant find them around here any more
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: mow_delon on January 24, 2013, 08:08:48 PM
I just used up the last of my box of Jim Beam pucks.  They fine, but I don't know if I can see any difference between them and oak.  They burn just like oak pucks, only partially, in my smoker every time.  That why I don't like them as much, seems like a waste when they only 2/3 burn all the time.
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: Gafala on January 24, 2013, 10:38:20 PM
I use them when I do sausage's I like the flavor.
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: Habanero Smoker on January 25, 2013, 01:23:58 AM
I generally will use them on brisket and/or chuck, as I do with oak. Right out of the package, the two smell differently, but I can't distinguish much difference after the smoke has been applied. Maybe if I try oak and Jim Beam on chicken, fish or pork, I may be able to tell the difference.
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: cackler69 on January 25, 2013, 05:51:48 AM
Coincidentally, I used them on my jerky yesterday. MUCH better than the hickory or mesquite IMO. Not overpowering, just right. I'm very pleased with them. They're very hard to find here.

Mrs. C  :-*
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: Smokeville on January 25, 2013, 04:36:12 PM
I use JB on salmon belly. You have to try it to appreciate the difference over Oak. Also, I used to use Crown Royal, but when that became extinct that's when I moved to JB. Turned out the CR was insipid in comparison.... (and as a Canadian I love rye but not corn).

Rich
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: Alanfromwis on January 26, 2013, 06:31:43 AM
  I have not tried JB bisquettes, & I believe they are from white oak. That is what most whiskey & wine barrels are made from. Red oak is different in color & texture, but don't know about smoke flavor.
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: DeeDubz - Smokin Bro #1 on January 26, 2013, 09:07:33 AM
I am planning to use JB for the first time with bacon next weekend. I will let you know my results!
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: Tenpoint5 on January 26, 2013, 09:20:44 AM
Since the Jim Beam has gone the way of the buffalo around here I have gotten to really like the whisky oak pucks
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: Smokeville on March 05, 2013, 06:15:59 AM
JB is great on salmon belly.
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: Angus on June 09, 2013, 06:50:05 PM
I've been trying to find the JB or whiskey oak pucks but having a hard time. Seems most places are out of stock. The few sites I can find, the prices are super inflated.
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: Saber 4 on June 09, 2013, 07:10:56 PM
I haven't used them but I did see them at Cabela's and I think the price was the same as all the other woods. If you don't live near a Cabela's you can go to their website cabelas.com and order them online, I don't think the shipping would be bad.
Title: Re: Jim beam bisquettes
Post by: Angus on June 09, 2013, 07:36:29 PM
Thanks for the tip. I looked at Bass Pro and Gander but not Cabelas. They had whiskey oak in stock!